How do you define "piggyback"?

I've noticed there is a wide range of definitions for "piggyback" where I work, which is sort of a problem since our IV policies refer to "piggyback" IV's numerous times.

Is it just where I work, or is there a more universally agreed upon definition out there?
To me it's anything running thru the secondary set thru the pump, with the primary being the base hydrating fluid (ie, normal saline or D5 or some specialty elyte mix from the pharmacy).

At my facility we basically refer to piggybacks as anything (usually IV antibiotics) that doesn't run continuously. For example - Levaquin that is given once daily.

Quote from Testa Rosa, RNTo me it's anything running thru the secondary set thru the pump, with the primary being the base hydrating fluid (ie, normal saline or D5 or some specialty elyte mix from the pharmacy).

Quote from MunoRNWhich brings up a related question: What is a secondary? I've always believed that a secondary is by definition intermittent, so is it possible to have a "continuous secondary"?

Quote from msjellybeanI run continuous chemo on a secondary line.

It's called piggyback because it is given on top of the primary IV solution (NS, LR) and hung higher to allow for intermittent infusion and once finished, switches back to the primary. So no, not possible to have a continuous secondary.I've heard places call IVP piggyback (because it's also intermittent) but that confuses the heck out of things.

Yes, the chemo gets its own pump. And the primary in that instance is usually nothing more than plain IVF set at TKO, mainly used just to prime the tubing with.Depending on how many lines the pt has available, sometimes we will y in. Had a pt last night with a double lumen PICC, getting continuous Ara-C, continuous pca + IVF & q6 abx. Ideal situation. Had another pt a few weeks ago that was getting three different agents (two of which were continuous, but can't for the life of me remember what they were). She only had a port. Somehow, they were all compatible, so they all got y-ed into each other. They all still had their own pumps of course.

Piggyback is anything that is attached to the main IV line. The Main IV line usually has your maintance fluid in it. And the piggyback is your secondary line. Either Y'd together and hung by gravity, or attached the secondary port on a pump. If I was to hang an intermittant drug without another fluid, then I would have to put it on a primary line. In that case, I wouldn't call it piggyback since it is the main fluid.Its called piggyback because it "rides" along on the main line.

Quote from msjellybeanYes, the chemo gets its own pump. And the primary in that instance is usually nothing more than plain IVF set at TKO, mainly used just to prime the tubing with.Depending on how many lines the pt has available, sometimes we will y in. Had a pt last night with a double lumen PICC, getting continuous Ara-C, continuous pca + IVF & q6 abx. Ideal situation. Had another pt a few weeks ago that was getting three different agents (two of which were continuous, but can't for the life of me remember what they were). She only had a port. Somehow, they were all compatible, so they all got y-ed into each other. They all still had their own pumps of course.

Quote from ObtundedRNPiggyback is anything that is attached to the main IV line. The Main IV line usually has your maintance fluid in it. And the piggyback is your secondary line. Either Y'd together and hung by gravity, or attached the secondary port on a pump. If I was to hang an intermittant drug without another fluid, then I would have to put it on a primary line. In that case, I wouldn't call it piggyback since it is the main fluid.Its called piggyback because it "rides" along on the main line.

Quote from MunoRNIf its on its own pump, do you program the chemo into it's pump as primary or secondary?

Quote from MunoRNSo you'd call a line y'd in either above or below the pump a secondary?